Coque samsung galaxy s7 mms In search of purity-coque iphone 6 milan ac-jvwfau

In search of purity

It was tempting to pitch the Lumia 950 and iPhone 11 Pro head to head, with our comparator, and maybe I’ll do just that in a future article. But context is everything and with the ‘industry leading’ (according to some) Pixel camera now under Android 10 coque iphone 11 and with Huawei’s camera algorithms now mature (though still over eager, in my view), I’m opting for a four way comparison. Yet again, the question I’m asking is: if a Lumia 950 owner wanted to keep the same IQ and yet needed to jump to another smartphone platform, which one, and which device to target

As usual, all shots are handheld and on full auto (other than turning off auto flash) and at (PureView/pixel binned) default resolutions. All AI aids (from the Lumia 950’s fairly simple HDR to the Pixel and iPhone’s HDR+ and Smart HDR, to the P30 Pro’s ‘AI enhancer’ system) were left turned on, to see how the manufacturers wanted to treat each scene.

It should coque s9 samsung original also be noted that the iPhone 11 Pro and Huawei P30 Pro have extra, useful, wide angle lenses, but coque iphone 5 these aren’t matched by the Lumia and Pixel, so we’ll leave a direct comparison of these from the equation, for now. Although the Lumia and Pixel don’t have telephoto lenses, they do have a workable coque samsung s8 souple silicone software zoom, through PureView smart coque personnalisees iphone cropping and multi exposure combination, respectively, so I think zoom is fair game for comparison here.

Test 1: Sunny landscape

A doddle for any phone camera, of course, with masses of detail to examine in gory detail. This is the rather picturesque Oracle in Reading, UK. Here’s the scene from the Lumia 950:

And here coque samsung a6 stitch are 1:1 crops from, in order, the Lumia 950, the Google Pixel 3 XL, the Huawei P30 Pro, and the Apple iPhone 11 Pro, click the phone names here for the original JPGs, to do your own analysis:

All four crops are pretty good in this light, of course, coque paillette samsung s8 plus but the Lumia just takes the win on purity. in the white fencing) have ‘jaggies’. Anyway, let your own eyes be the judge and yes, grab the originals if you’re keen, to do your own checks and analysis in the photo editor of your choice.

Scores: Lumia 950 XL: 10; Google Pixel 3 XL: 9; Huawei P30 Pro: 9; Apple iPhone 11 Pro: 9

Test 2: Sunny landscape, zoomed

The same Oracle scene. I’ve gone to 2x, at which level three of the phone cameras are happy, but in the P30 Pro’s defense and assuming that if you wanted to zoom then you probably wouldn’t mind more of it, I’ve allowed the P30 Pro’s 5x periscope zoom lens.

So here are 1:1 crops from, in order, the Lumia 950, the Google Pixel 3 XL, the Huawei P30 Pro, and the Apple iPhone 11 Pro, click the phone names here for the original JPGs, to do your own analysis:

Unsurprisingly, the Lumia 950 and Pixel’s 2x zoom is imperfect, coque samsung s8 silicone transparent in each case with some guesswork the Lumia’s attempt comes off as too ‘blocky’, while the Pixel’s is too ‘vague’. In contrast, the optical zoom coque samsung a20 of the iPhone 11 Pro (2x, but incredibly precise and sharp) and the P30 Pro (5x, though over sharpened and over processed) produce more and better zoom. The P30 Pro has to win this, but not by a landslide the iPhone’s output is very satisfying and useful, whereas (as I’ve pointed out before) coque samsung galaxy s7 mms 5x zoom is overkill for many situations and the Huawei can’t use its telephoto beneath this zoom factor.

Scores: Lumia 950 XL: 6; Google Pixel 3 XL: 6; Huawei P30 Pro: 9; Apple iPhone 11 Pro: coque samsung galaxy a5 2017 survivor 8

Test 3: Landscape no.2 greenery overload

A pretty canal lock and a favourite place to snap in the sun. Here’s the scene from the Google Pixel 3 XL, for reasons I’ll explain below:

And here are 1:1 crops from, in order, coque rhinoshield pour samsung s8 the Lumia 950, the Google Pixel 3 XL, the Huawei P30 Pro, and the Apple iPhone 11 Pro, click the phone names here for the original JPGs, to do your own analysis:

Now, you could argue that the Lumia 950 XL’s shot renders greenery best, but the iPhone runs it close and I have to dock the 950 XL a point or two because of the yellow cast, seen clearly here on the grey concrete, which appears almost orange as a result! I know coque s7 edge samsung disney the Lumia was trying to represent a warm sunny day, but it clearly coque portefeuille s10 plus samsung goes too far. Then there’s dynamic range, with the bright sun on the stonework causing some blow out on all but the Pixel 3 XL’s shot.

Scores: Lumia 950 XL: 7; Google Pixel 3 XL: 9; Huawei P30 Pro: 8; Apple iPhone 11 Pro: 8

Test 4: Interior detail overload

The church in Sonning, with masses of detail to latch onto and pleasant interior lighting in places (thanks to it being sunny outside still!). Here’s the scene from the Lumia 950:

And here are 1:1 crops from, in order, the Lumia 950, the Google Pixel coque samsung s9 plus noir 3 XL, the Huawei P30 Pro, and the Apple iPhone 11 Pro, samsung s10 plus coque silicone click the phone names here for the original JPGs, to do your own analysis:

Don’t be swayed by the dramatic attempt by the last three camera phones to extract the carved patterns in the wood of the pulpit it’s impressive, but unrealistic and they couldn’t be seen in such detail with the naked eye. This focus on increasing contrast coque s8 plus samsung silicone 360 and sharpness is a modern trend, of course, and it adversely affects other items in a scene. So the flowers here, for example, look more natural in the Lumia photo and more artificial in the others. I realise that it’s a small ‘hill to die on’, but I want my greenery to look real and not like it’s from a colour photocopy.

The colour differences in the wood are interesting the Lumia (unusually) gets the wood about right to my eyes, along with absolute purity, while the others lighten the wood and also introduce noise (or coque samsung galaxy a5 2016 fourrure noise plus smoothing in the Huawei’s case).

Scores: Lumia 950 XL: 10; Google Pixel 3 XL: 8; Huawei P30 Pro: 8; Apple iPhone 11 Pro: 8

Test 5: Interior detail, zoomed

Look, if I just tested phone camera with no zoom (or wide angle) then the four year old Lumia 950 XL is going to keep winning, even in 2019. Because it’s main PureView camera (at least, unzoomed) is that good. So we’ll give the others a chance again, by looking at zoom (2x or 5x, in the P30 Pro’s case) in the previous church interior setting and see where we get to.

And here are 1:1 crops from, in order, the Lumia 950, the Google Pixel 3 XL, the Huawei P30 Pro, and the Apple iPhone 11 Pro, click the phone names here for the original JPGs, to do your own analysis:

Similar to the coque cactus samsung a8 previous zoom test, the Huawei’s 5x periscope zoom is in another class (if you actually need to zoom in that far) and so has to win here, even if there’s that odd ‘noise reduced and then sharpened’ processed look. You’re optically that much closer, etc. The iPhone 11 Pro’s genuine 2x telephoto does very well though, not blowing out the window too much and producing clear detail. One step back, the coque iphone xr Pixel’s shot is more contrasty, though not in a good way, and samsung a7 coque licorne the Lumia actually brings up last place here I did say that zooming wasn’t its strong suit!..